KeyListener Plugin v1.0.0

here are two ways to approach it, one uncommented and the other commented:

Code:

[Variables]Code=2162067;Code=4162164160084[Rainmeter]Update=1000AccurateText=1DynamicWindowSize=1---Measures---[KeyCount]Measure=CalcFormula=(Trunc(#Code#/10**((15+Trunc(Log(#Code#)-0))%15))%1000);Formula=Trunc((#Code#%1000**Max(0,4))/1000**Max(0,3))DynamicVariables=1[KeyNumb1]Measure=CalcFormula=(Trunc(#Code#/10**((15+Trunc(Log(#Code#)-3))%15))%1000);Formula=Trunc((#Code#%1000**Max(0,3))/1000**Max(0,2))DynamicVariables=1[KeyNumb2]Measure=CalcFormula=(Trunc(#Code#/10**((15+Trunc(Log(#Code#)-6))%15))%1000);Formula=Trunc((#Code#%1000**Max(0,2))/1000**Max(0,1))DynamicVariables=1[KeyNumb3]Measure=CalcFormula=(Trunc(#Code#/10**((15+Trunc(Log(#Code#)-9))%15))%1000);Formula=Trunc((#Code#%1000**Max(0,1))/1000**Max(0,0))DynamicVariables=1[KeyNumb4]Measure=CalcFormula=(Trunc(#Code#/10**((15+Trunc(Log(#Code#)-12))%15))%1000);Formula=Trunc((#Code#%1000**Max(0,0))/1000**Max(0,-1))DynamicVariables=1[KeyNumb5]Measure=CalcFormula=(Trunc(#Code#/10**((15+Trunc(Log(#Code#)-15))%15))%1000);Formula=Trunc((#Code#%1000**Max(0,-1))/1000**Max(0,-2))DynamicVariables=1---Meters---[Result]Meter=StringSolidColor=0,0,0,128FontColor=255,255,255,255FontFace=ConsolasFontSize=16Padding=5,5,5,5AntiAlias=1MeasureName =KeyCountMeasureName2=KeyNumb1MeasureName3=KeyNumb2MeasureName4=KeyNumb3MeasureName5=KeyNumb4MeasureName6=KeyNumb5Text=Key Count = %1#CRLF#Key No. 1 = %2#CRLF#Key No. 2 = %3#CRLF#Key No. 3 = %4#CRLF#Key No. 4 = %5#CRLF#Key No. 5 = %6UpdateDivider=-1

The uncommented formulas use Log() to do stuff based on the Code's number of digits, and that allows knowing exactly what part a value corresponds to. Normally, (Trunc(#Code#/10**Trunc(Log(#Code#)-N))%1000) would have been enough, if not for Log(#Code#)-N messing things when below 0, so I had to use (NMax+Trunc(Log(#Code#)-
N))%NMax to keep it afloat and still provide the suited value to have the "empty" [KeyNumbX] return 0. I could have used 3*n instead of N, with n ranging from 0 to 5 and matching the measure indexes, but I didn't to keep the formula shorter. The idea is simple, get the integer part of the division of Code by powers of 10 that are subsequently offset by 3 based on the Code's number of digits, followed by getting the remainder of that divided by 1000.

The commented formulas are a simpler and reverse version of the uncommented ones, but without any reliance on the Code's number of digits, so values will "migrate" between measures based on the latter. Again, it could have been even the simpler Trunc((#Code#%1000**(N))/1000**(N-1)), but I had to use Max(0,X) for the same reason, to keep things positive. It's the reverse of the previous idea, as we now first get the remainder of Code divided by powers of 1000, followed by getting the integer part of that divided by the next lower power of 1000.